TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
They should focus on the cops who didnt do anything instead of videogames.
It is unfortunate that this particular school was a perfect trifecta of failure:
1. No school security,
2. Klondike cops as police that did not follow their training,
3. No external fencing or self locking doors. No repair for doors to one particular classroom or a simply mechanical throw bolt to use in an emergency.
There are no grounds to sue the manufacturer of the firearms except to attempt to drive them out of business. They broke no laws and it was sold after a background check (that the FBI could have stopped).
Again suing a game manufacturer and Instagram is simply a reach for irrelevant deep pockets.
The only question to ask when there is a publicized “mass shooting event” or “mass murder event” is this: Was it a false-flag attack — a real attack carried out by the government in which there are real victims, or was it a hoax attack — an attack carried out by the government in which everything is staged and no one is killed?
The May 24, 2022 Uvalde, Texas Robb Elementary School “shooting” was a hoax attack.
Here are the 18 characteristics of a hoax attack. Notice how many occurred coincident to the Uvalde event:
1. Immediate identification of the alleged gunman;
2. Coordinated speeches by politicians, entertainers, and news celebrities immediately after the “shooting” demanding more gun control;
3. Coordinated speeches by politicians, entertainers, and news celebrities immediately after the “shooting” demanding more censorship of “hate speech”;
4. Interviews with strangely calm “relatives” of the “victims” that quickly turn into emotional appeals for more gun control;
5. A “manifesto” by the “shooter” promoting ideas that the international corporate elite wants to discredit;
6. Recently-created social media accounts by the “shooter” containing posts and photographs promoting ideas that the international corporate elite wants to discredit;
7. A cute victim who becomes the face of the “tragedy”;
8. A designated hero who rushes at or tackles the “shooter”; fearlessly leads people to safety; or shields his wife, child, or girlfriend from the “shooter”;
9. Perfectly lit and composed photographs of people fleeing from the “shooter” or hiding from the “shooter”;
10. Prayer circles, flower drops, and candlelight vigils for the “victims” within hours of the “shooting”;
11. Extreme discrepancies among eyewitness accounts that cannot be reconciled — vast differences in the number of shooters, number of shots fired, length of time of the shooting, length of time before the arrival of the police, length of time before the shooting stopped after the arrival of the police, etc.;
12. Statements from family members of the “shooter” within a day or two of the “shooting” supporting the official narrative in its entirety — accepting without question the guilt of their son/grandson/nephew, condemning his actions, and denouncing the ideology of his “manifesto”;
13. Awkward, inconsistent updates on the medical status of the “victims” by doctors and hospital spokesmen;
14. Interviews with “gravely injured” victims who recover in a few days, show virtually no sign of injury, and almost immediately begin talking about gun control;
15. Strangely festive “remembrances” or “memorials” to the “victims” featuring “butterfly releases” or “dove releases”;
16. News reports that there was an “active shooter drill” scheduled near the location of the “shooting” around the time of the event;
17. Witnesses who — by amazing coincidence — were also present at a previous “mass shooting event”; and
18. When the script calls for the “shooter” to be captured, the “shooter” is apprehended without incident and makes a complete confession.
The starting point for knowing the truth is to believe the opposite of what the government and the corporate media tell us. . .